Course Content
India and the Contemporary World-II | NCERT Class 10 | History
About Lesson
  1. Colonial Control Over the Press before 1798 ๐Ÿ“œ๐Ÿ”’๐Ÿ“ฐ
  • The East India Company initially showed little concern about press censorship ๐Ÿง.
  • Early measures were not aimed at controlling the press as a whole, but rather to limit criticisms from Englishmen in India ๐Ÿดโ€โ˜ ๏ธ.
  • The Company feared that these criticisms could be used in England to attack their monopoly on trade ๐Ÿ’ผ๐Ÿ’ฐ.
  • These English critics raised concerns about Company misrule, and the Company feared this could undermine their reputation ๐ŸŒ and power in India ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ.
  • To prevent backlash, the Company started regulating printed materials to protect their business interests in England โš–๏ธ.
  1. Early Press Regulations and Reforms in the 1820s ๐Ÿ“…๐Ÿ“–โœ๏ธ
  • In the 1820s, the Calcutta Supreme Court passed new regulations to control the press ๐Ÿ›๏ธ.
  • These regulations were designed to restrict freedom of the press and suppress anti-British sentiment ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡งโŒ.
  • The East India Company began encouraging newspapers that would celebrate British rule ๐ŸŽ‰๐Ÿ“œ, aiming to present British governance as positive and benevolent.
  • By 1835, in response to petitions from editors of English and vernacular newspapers ๐Ÿ“ฃ, Governor-General Bentinck agreed to revise the press laws ๐Ÿ”„.
  • Thomas Macaulay, a liberal colonial official, formulated new rules that restored some press freedoms โœจ, allowing newspapers to publish more freely while still keeping control over critical material.
  • These reforms reflected a shift towards a more liberal stance on press regulation, though still under colonial oversight ๐Ÿดโ€โ˜ ๏ธ.

ย 

  1. Post-1857 Shift in Press Control โš”๏ธ๐Ÿ“ฐ๐Ÿ”’
  • After the 1857 revolt, the colonial government became much stricter in regulating the press ๐Ÿ“œ๐Ÿ”’.
  • The authorities were concerned that vernacular newspapers ๐Ÿ“ฐ might spread nationalist ideas and encourage resistance to British rule.
  • Fearing the influence of the press, the government decided to clamp down on vernacular publications that were seen as seditious โš”๏ธ.
  • The press was now viewed as a tool for spreading anti-colonial sentiments and a threat to the British Empire ๐ŸŒ๐Ÿ‘Ž.
  • This shift led to a widespread suppression of the free press ๐Ÿ›‘, especially for Indian-language newspapers that were now viewed as dangerous.
  1. The Vernacular Press Act of 1878 ๐Ÿ“œ๐Ÿ”Ž๐Ÿ–‹๏ธ
  • In 1878, the Vernacular Press Act was introduced to give the government broad powers to censor and seize newspapers that were deemed seditious โš–๏ธ.
  • The Act allowed the colonial government to monitor vernacular newspapers closely, especially those that criticized British rule ๐ŸŒโŒ.
  • If a report was found to be anti-government or seditious, the newspaper could face warnings or even seizure of its printing press ๐Ÿ–จ๏ธ๐Ÿšซ.
  • This law led to the confiscation of printing machinery ๐Ÿญ if the warnings were ignored, drastically affecting the ability of newspapers to publish freely.
  • Despite these repressive measures, the vernacular press continued to grow, becoming an important source of nationalist sentiment and resistance ๐Ÿ“ข๐Ÿ’ช.

ย 

  1. Nationalist Press and the Cycle of Persecution ๐Ÿ—ž๏ธโœŠ๐Ÿ”ฅ
  • Despite government repression, the nationalist press continued to flourish, with newspapers highlighting colonial misrule ๐Ÿ“ฐ๐Ÿ”ด.
  • These publications became powerful tools for spreading anti-colonial sentiments and nationalist ideas ๐Ÿ’ฅ.
  • The press provoked widespread protests and sparked a renewed cycle of persecution ๐Ÿ”„, with colonial authorities retaliating against critics ๐Ÿ›‘.
  • One significant incident was the 1907 deportation of Punjab revolutionaries โœˆ๏ธ, which further fueled nationalist anger.
  • This led to a vicious cycle, with repression and protests going hand in hand, strengthening the resolve for freedom ๐Ÿ•Š๏ธ.
  1. The Struggle for Loyalist Press Editors ๐Ÿ“ฐ๐Ÿ’ผ๐Ÿ”
  • The colonial government struggled to find editors for loyalist newspapers that would comply with its views ๐Ÿง.
  • Many editors were hesitant to take up the position because they feared losing editorial freedom ๐Ÿ“๐Ÿ”’.
  • Sanders, the editor of The Statesman, refused to accept government subsidies, stating that taking money would compromise the paperโ€™s independence ๐Ÿ’ธโŒ.
  • Some loyalist papers feared that government support would lead to editorial control, and they preferred to maintain their freedom of expression ๐Ÿ’ฌ.
  1. Censorship during the World Wars ๐ŸŒโœ‚๏ธโš”๏ธ
  • During World War I, the Defence of India Rules required 22 newspapers to furnish securities ๐Ÿ’ฐ.
  • Many of these newspapers, unwilling to comply with government demands, chose to shut down ๐Ÿšซ instead of compromising their independence.
  • In 1919, the Sedition Committee Report imposed even stricter controls, further restricting freedom of the press ๐Ÿ“š๐Ÿ”’.
  • The Defence of India Act (1939) was passed during World War II, allowing the censorship of any content related to the war effort, including news about the Quit India Movement ๐Ÿ›‘.
  • This period saw increased suppression, with around 90 newspapers shut down in August 1942 as they were seen as anti-colonial ๐Ÿ“ฐโŒ.