About Lesson
1. Gandhiโs Decision to Withdraw the Non-Cooperation Movement โ
- February 1922: Mahatma Gandhi decided to withdraw the Non-Cooperation Movement due to increasing violence in various parts of India โ๏ธ.
- The movement had gained momentum, with millions of Indians participating in protests and boycotts against British rule ๐ฎ๐ณโ.
- Gandhi was troubled by the violence in several areas, which went against the principles of non-violence that the movement was founded on ๐ฅโ.
- Gandhiโs belief in ahimsa (non-violence) meant he could not support a movement if it led to violent outbreaks โ๏ธ๐ซ.
- Gandhi argued that satyagrahis (followers of non-violence) were not yet sufficiently trained to engage in mass struggles properly ๐๐งโโ๏ธ.
- He emphasized that proper training in non-violent methods was necessary before they could engage in large-scale resistance ๐๏ธโโ๏ธ.
- The growing violence made Gandhi reconsider the effectiveness of continuing the movement in its current form ๐๐.
- Gandhi believed that non-violence was not just a political strategy but a moral obligation โ๐.
- The decision to withdraw was a turning point in the independence movement, requiring a reevaluation of strategies ๐๐.
2. Internal Debate within the Congress ๐๏ธ
- After the withdrawal of the Non-Cooperation Movement, there was a significant debate within the Congress over the future direction of the movement ๐ฃ๏ธ๐ฌ.
- Some Congress leaders were tired of mass struggles and wanted to engage in elections for the provincial councils set up by the Government of India Act of 1919 ๐๐ณ๏ธ.
- These councils were a form of self-governance under British supervision, and the leaders in favor of this approach wanted to push for reforms from within ๐๏ธโ๏ธ.
- Their goal was to oppose British policies within the councils, highlight their undemocratic nature, and argue for reforms and more autonomy ๐ฌ๐ง๐ซ.
- Motilal Nehru and C. R. Das formed the Swaraj Party to advocate for a return to council politics ๐งโ๐ผ๐.
- The Swaraj Party believed that by participating in the councils, they could influence British policy and expose the system’s flaws ๐ก๐.
- However, younger leaders like Jawaharlal Nehru and Subhas Chandra Bose opposed this moderate approach โกโ.
- The younger leaders called for radical action and argued that participation in councils was a compromise with British rule ๐โ.
- They believed that complete independence could only be achieved through mass agitation and direct action ๐ฅโก.
- Constitutional reforms were seen as insufficient, and the goal should be to break free from British control entirely ๐๐ฎ๐ณ.
- The younger faction gained more influence and began to push for Purna Swaraj (complete independence) ๐๐.
- The Swaraj Party continued to push for political engagement within the British system, but the younger faction was increasingly dominant in Congress discussions ๐๏ธ๐.
- This internal conflict ultimately led Congress to formally adopt complete independence and reject any form of dominion status or continued British control ๐ซ๐ฃ๏ธ.
ย
3. Impact of the Worldwide Economic Depression ๐๐ธ
- The worldwide economic depression in the late 1920s had a devastating impact on India, particularly in rural areas ๐๏ธ๐ฐ.
- Agricultural prices began to decline in 1926, creating financial difficulties for farmers and landlords ๐๐.
- By 1930, agricultural prices had completely collapsed, causing severe economic distress across the country โ ๏ธ๐.
- The demand for agricultural goods fell sharply, leading to reduced exports and a glut of unsold produce ๐ฆโ.
- Peasants found it increasingly difficult to sell their harvests, leading to massive income losses ๐พ๐ธ.
- Many farmers were unable to pay land revenue and other taxes to the British government, increasing financial burdens ๐ฆโ๏ธ.
- This crisis resulted in widespread rural distress, leading to peasant uprisings, protests, and growing resentment against British policies ๐๐ฅ.
- The economic depression deepened the divide between the rich and the poor, as landlords and moneylenders took advantage of struggling farmers ๐ฐโ๏ธ.
- This growing economic instability contributed to an increase in political activism as the masses became more involved in the freedom movement ๐๏ธโ.
4. The Simon Commission and Public Response ๐๐ฅ
- In 1927, the British government set up the Statutory Commission, led by Sir John Simon, to review Indiaโs constitutional system โ๏ธ๐ฌ๐ง.
- The commission was tasked with examining the existing system and suggesting reforms to address Indian political aspirations ๐๏ธ๐.
- However, the commission had no Indian members, as all of them were British officials, making it highly unpopular in India ๐ฌ๐งโ.
- Indian leaders saw this as a deliberate insult, ignoring the aspirations of millions of Indians who were fighting for self-governance ๐ซ๐ก.
- When the Simon Commission arrived in 1928, it faced widespread protests and demonstrations in different cities ๐๏ธโ.
- Protesters raised the powerful slogan “Go Back Simon”, demanding the immediate withdrawal of the commission ๐ท๐ข.
- The Indian National Congress, the Muslim League, and other parties united in opposition, showing rare political solidarity ๐งโ๐คโ๐ง๐ค.
- Demonstrations were organized across the country, with thousands of people participating in strikes, marches, and boycotts ๐ถโโ๏ธ๐.
- The police responded with brutal force, leading to clashes with protesters and the tragic death of Lala Lajpat Rai, a senior leader who was lathi-charged during a protest in Lahore โ ๏ธ๐.
- The commissionโs arrival and the violent suppression of protests further fueled anti-British sentiment, strengthening the call for complete independence ๐ฅ๐ฎ๐ณ.
ย
5. Lord Irwin’s Offer and Rising Tensions ๐๏ธ๐ฅ
- In October 1929, the Viceroy of India, Lord Irwin, made an announcement to ease rising political tensions in India ๐๏ธ๐.
- He offered a vague promise of โdominion statusโ for India, but without a clear timeline or concrete details ๐ฎโณ.
- Additionally, he proposed the organization of a Round Table Conference to discuss a future Indian constitution ๐๏ธ๐ .
- However, this offer failed to satisfy the Indian National Congress, which had already moved towards a demand for full independence ๐ฎ๐ณโ.
- Moderate leaders within the Congress considered negotiating, but the radicals rejected the offer, seeing it as a mere delaying tactic โ ๏ธ๐.
- Leaders like Jawaharlal Nehru and Subhas Chandra Bose strongly opposed accepting anything less than complete independence โ๐ฅ.
- The failure of Lord Irwinโs offer led to growing frustration and impatience within the nationalist movement ๐กโก.
- Tensions escalated as Congress leaders debated their next course of action, leading to the push for a more decisive break from British rule โ๏ธ๐ซ.
6. The Demand for Purna Swaraj (Complete Independence) ๐๐ณ๏ธ
- As opposition to British rule intensified, the radicals within the Congress, including Jawaharlal Nehru and Subhas Chandra Bose, became more vocal in their call for Purna Swaraj (complete independence) ๐ฎ๐ณ๐ฅ.
- Many leaders felt that dominion status under British rule was unacceptable, as it would still leave India partially controlled by the British Crown ๐๏ธโ.
- In December 1929, at the Lahore session of the Indian National Congress, Jawaharlal Nehru was elected as the Congress President ๐๏ธ๐ .
- Under Nehruโs leadership, the Congress formally passed a resolution declaring complete independence as its official goal ๐ฏโ.
- The resolution rejected any compromise with British rule and committed to achieving sovereignty through mass struggle ๐ช๐ฅ.
- To mark this decision, Congress declared that 26 January 1930 would be observed as Independence Day across the country ๐ ๐.
- On this day, people were urged to take a pledge to fight for Indiaโs complete independence from British rule ๐๐ฎ๐ณ.
- However, despite the resolution, the idea of freedom still seemed abstract to many Indians, and the celebrations received limited participation initially ๐โ.
7. The Independence Day Pledge (26 January 1930) ๐๐ฎ๐ณ
- On 26 January 1930, people across India were asked to take the Independence Day Pledge, which contained several key points ๐โ๏ธ.
- The pledge asserted that freedom was an inalienable right of every Indian, just like any other people in the world ๐งโ๐พ๐ฝ.
- It emphasized that Indian people deserved the fruits of their labor, as well as basic necessities like food, shelter, and clothing ๐๐ .
- The pledge condemned the British government for exploiting Indiaโs economic resources, leaving millions in poverty and hardship ๐โ๏ธ.
- It accused British rule of causing Indiaโs economic, political, cultural, and spiritual decline over the years ๐๐ฌ๐งโ.
- The pledge proclaimed that if a government oppresses its people, they have the right to alter or abolish it by any means necessary โ๐ฅ.
- As a result, the pledge called for Indians to sever their ties with British rule and strive for Purna Swaraj (Complete Independence) ๐๏ธ๐จ.
- The observance of Independence Day in 1930 was a symbolic act, but it helped lay the foundation for future mass movements against British rule ๐ ๐ฅ.