Course Content
India and the Contemporary World-II | NCERT Class 10 | History
About Lesson

1. Gandhiโ€™s Decision to Withdraw the Non-Cooperation Movement โœ‹

  • February 1922: Mahatma Gandhi decided to withdraw the Non-Cooperation Movement due to increasing violence in various parts of India โš”๏ธ.
  • The movement had gained momentum, with millions of Indians participating in protests and boycotts against British rule ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณโœŠ.
  • Gandhi was troubled by the violence in several areas, which went against the principles of non-violence that the movement was founded on ๐Ÿ’ฅโŒ.
  • Gandhiโ€™s belief in ahimsa (non-violence) meant he could not support a movement if it led to violent outbreaks โš–๏ธ๐Ÿšซ.
  • Gandhi argued that satyagrahis (followers of non-violence) were not yet sufficiently trained to engage in mass struggles properly ๐Ÿ“š๐Ÿง˜โ€โ™‚๏ธ.
  • He emphasized that proper training in non-violent methods was necessary before they could engage in large-scale resistance ๐Ÿ‹๏ธโ€โ™€๏ธ.
  • The growing violence made Gandhi reconsider the effectiveness of continuing the movement in its current form ๐Ÿ”„๐Ÿ’”.
  • Gandhi believed that non-violence was not just a political strategy but a moral obligation โœŠ๐Ÿ’–.
  • The decision to withdraw was a turning point in the independence movement, requiring a reevaluation of strategies ๐Ÿ›‘๐Ÿ”„.

2. Internal Debate within the Congress ๐Ÿ›๏ธ

  • After the withdrawal of the Non-Cooperation Movement, there was a significant debate within the Congress over the future direction of the movement ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ๐Ÿ’ฌ.
  • Some Congress leaders were tired of mass struggles and wanted to engage in elections for the provincial councils set up by the Government of India Act of 1919 ๐Ÿ“œ๐Ÿ—ณ๏ธ.
  • These councils were a form of self-governance under British supervision, and the leaders in favor of this approach wanted to push for reforms from within ๐Ÿ›๏ธโš–๏ธ.
  • Their goal was to oppose British policies within the councils, highlight their undemocratic nature, and argue for reforms and more autonomy ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿšซ.
  • Motilal Nehru and C. R. Das formed the Swaraj Party to advocate for a return to council politics ๐Ÿง‘โ€๐Ÿ’ผ๐Ÿ“Š.
  • The Swaraj Party believed that by participating in the councils, they could influence British policy and expose the system’s flaws ๐Ÿ’ก๐Ÿ”.
  • However, younger leaders like Jawaharlal Nehru and Subhas Chandra Bose opposed this moderate approach โšกโŒ.
  • The younger leaders called for radical action and argued that participation in councils was a compromise with British rule ๐ŸŒโœŠ.
  • They believed that complete independence could only be achieved through mass agitation and direct action ๐Ÿ’ฅโšก.
  • Constitutional reforms were seen as insufficient, and the goal should be to break free from British control entirely ๐Ÿ”“๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ.
  • The younger faction gained more influence and began to push for Purna Swaraj (complete independence) ๐Ÿ†๐ŸŒŸ.
  • The Swaraj Party continued to push for political engagement within the British system, but the younger faction was increasingly dominant in Congress discussions ๐Ÿ›๏ธ๐Ÿ“ˆ.
  • This internal conflict ultimately led Congress to formally adopt complete independence and reject any form of dominion status or continued British control ๐Ÿšซ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ.

ย 

3. Impact of the Worldwide Economic Depression ๐Ÿ“‰๐Ÿ’ธ

  • The worldwide economic depression in the late 1920s had a devastating impact on India, particularly in rural areas ๐Ÿž๏ธ๐Ÿ’ฐ.
  • Agricultural prices began to decline in 1926, creating financial difficulties for farmers and landlords ๐Ÿ“‰๐Ÿšœ.
  • By 1930, agricultural prices had completely collapsed, causing severe economic distress across the country โš ๏ธ๐Ÿ’”.
  • The demand for agricultural goods fell sharply, leading to reduced exports and a glut of unsold produce ๐Ÿ“ฆโŒ.
  • Peasants found it increasingly difficult to sell their harvests, leading to massive income losses ๐ŸŒพ๐Ÿ’ธ.
  • Many farmers were unable to pay land revenue and other taxes to the British government, increasing financial burdens ๐Ÿฆโš–๏ธ.
  • This crisis resulted in widespread rural distress, leading to peasant uprisings, protests, and growing resentment against British policies ๐Ÿšœ๐Ÿ”ฅ.
  • The economic depression deepened the divide between the rich and the poor, as landlords and moneylenders took advantage of struggling farmers ๐Ÿ’ฐโš–๏ธ.
  • This growing economic instability contributed to an increase in political activism as the masses became more involved in the freedom movement ๐Ÿ›๏ธโœŠ.

4. The Simon Commission and Public Response ๐Ÿ“œ๐Ÿ‘ฅ

  • In 1927, the British government set up the Statutory Commission, led by Sir John Simon, to review Indiaโ€™s constitutional system โš–๏ธ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง.
  • The commission was tasked with examining the existing system and suggesting reforms to address Indian political aspirations ๐Ÿ›๏ธ๐Ÿ”.
  • However, the commission had no Indian members, as all of them were British officials, making it highly unpopular in India ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡งโŒ.
  • Indian leaders saw this as a deliberate insult, ignoring the aspirations of millions of Indians who were fighting for self-governance ๐Ÿšซ๐Ÿ˜ก.
  • When the Simon Commission arrived in 1928, it faced widespread protests and demonstrations in different cities ๐Ÿ™๏ธโœŠ.
  • Protesters raised the powerful slogan “Go Back Simon”, demanding the immediate withdrawal of the commission ๐Ÿšท๐Ÿ“ข.
  • The Indian National Congress, the Muslim League, and other parties united in opposition, showing rare political solidarity ๐Ÿง‘โ€๐Ÿคโ€๐Ÿง‘๐Ÿค.
  • Demonstrations were organized across the country, with thousands of people participating in strikes, marches, and boycotts ๐Ÿšถโ€โ™‚๏ธ๐Ÿ›‘.
  • The police responded with brutal force, leading to clashes with protesters and the tragic death of Lala Lajpat Rai, a senior leader who was lathi-charged during a protest in Lahore โš ๏ธ๐Ÿ’”.
  • The commissionโ€™s arrival and the violent suppression of protests further fueled anti-British sentiment, strengthening the call for complete independence ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ.

ย 

5. Lord Irwin’s Offer and Rising Tensions ๐Ÿ›๏ธ๐Ÿ”ฅ

  • In October 1929, the Viceroy of India, Lord Irwin, made an announcement to ease rising political tensions in India ๐Ÿ›๏ธ๐Ÿ“œ.
  • He offered a vague promise of โ€˜dominion statusโ€™ for India, but without a clear timeline or concrete details ๐Ÿ”ฎโณ.
  • Additionally, he proposed the organization of a Round Table Conference to discuss a future Indian constitution ๐Ÿ›๏ธ๐Ÿ“….
  • However, this offer failed to satisfy the Indian National Congress, which had already moved towards a demand for full independence ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณโŒ.
  • Moderate leaders within the Congress considered negotiating, but the radicals rejected the offer, seeing it as a mere delaying tactic โš ๏ธ๐Ÿ›‘.
  • Leaders like Jawaharlal Nehru and Subhas Chandra Bose strongly opposed accepting anything less than complete independence โœŠ๐Ÿ”ฅ.
  • The failure of Lord Irwinโ€™s offer led to growing frustration and impatience within the nationalist movement ๐Ÿ˜กโšก.
  • Tensions escalated as Congress leaders debated their next course of action, leading to the push for a more decisive break from British rule โš–๏ธ๐Ÿšซ.

6. The Demand for Purna Swaraj (Complete Independence) ๐Ÿ“œ๐Ÿ—ณ๏ธ

  • As opposition to British rule intensified, the radicals within the Congress, including Jawaharlal Nehru and Subhas Chandra Bose, became more vocal in their call for Purna Swaraj (complete independence) ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ’ฅ.
  • Many leaders felt that dominion status under British rule was unacceptable, as it would still leave India partially controlled by the British Crown ๐Ÿ›๏ธโŒ.
  • In December 1929, at the Lahore session of the Indian National Congress, Jawaharlal Nehru was elected as the Congress President ๐Ÿ›๏ธ๐Ÿ“….
  • Under Nehruโ€™s leadership, the Congress formally passed a resolution declaring complete independence as its official goal ๐ŸŽฏโœŠ.
  • The resolution rejected any compromise with British rule and committed to achieving sovereignty through mass struggle ๐Ÿ’ช๐Ÿ”ฅ.
  • To mark this decision, Congress declared that 26 January 1930 would be observed as Independence Day across the country ๐Ÿ“…๐ŸŽ‰.
  • On this day, people were urged to take a pledge to fight for Indiaโ€™s complete independence from British rule ๐Ÿ“œ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ.
  • However, despite the resolution, the idea of freedom still seemed abstract to many Indians, and the celebrations received limited participation initially ๐ŸŽ‡โŒ.

7. The Independence Day Pledge (26 January 1930) ๐Ÿ“๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ

  • On 26 January 1930, people across India were asked to take the Independence Day Pledge, which contained several key points ๐Ÿ“œโœ๏ธ.
  • The pledge asserted that freedom was an inalienable right of every Indian, just like any other people in the world ๐Ÿง‘โ€๐ŸŒพ๐Ÿ—ฝ.
  • It emphasized that Indian people deserved the fruits of their labor, as well as basic necessities like food, shelter, and clothing ๐Ÿž๐Ÿ .
  • The pledge condemned the British government for exploiting Indiaโ€™s economic resources, leaving millions in poverty and hardship ๐Ÿ’”โš–๏ธ.
  • It accused British rule of causing Indiaโ€™s economic, political, cultural, and spiritual decline over the years ๐Ÿ“‰๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡งโŒ.
  • The pledge proclaimed that if a government oppresses its people, they have the right to alter or abolish it by any means necessary โœŠ๐Ÿ”ฅ.
  • As a result, the pledge called for Indians to sever their ties with British rule and strive for Purna Swaraj (Complete Independence) ๐Ÿ›๏ธ๐Ÿšจ.
  • The observance of Independence Day in 1930 was a symbolic act, but it helped lay the foundation for future mass movements against British rule ๐Ÿ“…๐Ÿ’ฅ.