Course Content
India and the Contemporary World-II | NCERT Class 10 | History
About Lesson

1. Nationwide Satyagraha Against the Rowlatt Act (1919) ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ“œ

  • Background of the Rowlatt Act:

    • The Rowlatt Act was passed by the British in March 1919 through the Imperial Legislative Council ๐Ÿ›๏ธ๐Ÿ“œ.
    • Despite strong and united opposition from Indian members, the Act was hurriedly passed ๐Ÿšซ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ.
    • The law gave the British government enormous powers to control and suppress political activity in India ๐Ÿ’ผโš–๏ธ.
    • The Act allowed the detention of political prisoners without trial for up to two years โณ๐Ÿ”’.
    • It was seen as a direct attack on the civil liberties and freedoms of the Indian people ๐Ÿšท๐Ÿ’”.
    • It gave the government the authority to suppress protests and curtail press freedom ๐Ÿ“ฐโŒ, leading to widespread resentment ๐Ÿ˜ก.
  • Gandhi’s Response:

    • Mahatma Gandhi decided to launch a nationwide satyagraha in protest against the Rowlatt Act โœŠ๐Ÿ•Š๏ธ.
    • Gandhi called for non-violent civil disobedience to challenge the Actโ€™s unjust provisions ๐Ÿง˜โ€โ™‚๏ธโš–๏ธ.
    • The movement was planned to start with a hartal (strike) on 6 April 1919 ๐Ÿ“…โœ‹.
    • Gandhi appealed to students ๐ŸŽ“, laborers ๐Ÿ› ๏ธ, and farmers ๐ŸŒพ to join the cause and participate in the protest.
    • People across India organized rallies ๐ŸŽค, strike actions in railway workshops ๐Ÿš‰, and closure of businesses ๐Ÿข.
    • Gandhi emphasized that the protest should remain non-violent ๐Ÿ•Š๏ธ, with participants using peaceful means to resist โœ‹.
  • British Response and Repression:

    • Alarmed by the growing popular resistance ๐Ÿ“ˆ, the British administration took repressive measures ๐Ÿ‘ฎโ€โ™‚๏ธ๐Ÿ’ฅ.
    • Local leaders in Amritsar were arrested to weaken the leadership of the movement ๐Ÿ”’๐Ÿ‘ฅ.
    • Mahatma Gandhi himself was barred from entering Delhi ๐Ÿšซ๐Ÿš‰, further escalating tensions.
    • On 10 April, the police in Amritsar opened fire on a peaceful procession of protestors ๐Ÿ’ฃ๐Ÿ”ซ.
    • This attack led to widespread anger ๐Ÿ’ฅ, resulting in retaliatory actions such as attacks on government buildings ๐Ÿข๐Ÿ”ฅ.
    • In response to the chaos, the British imposed martial law in Amritsar and surrounding areas โš”๏ธ๐Ÿšจ.
    • General Dyer was given command and tasked with suppressing the protests using extreme force ๐Ÿ›‘๐Ÿ‘ฎโ€โ™‚๏ธ.

2. Jallianwalla Bagh Massacre (13 April 1919) ๐Ÿ’”๐Ÿ’ฃ

  • The Incident:

    • On 13 April 1919, a large crowd gathered at Jallianwalla Bagh in Amritsar ๐Ÿž๏ธ๐Ÿ‘ฅ.
    • The crowd consisted of people attending the Baisakhi fair ๐ŸŽ‰ and others protesting the Rowlatt Act ๐Ÿ•Š๏ธโš–๏ธ.
    • Many people were unaware of the martial law that had been imposed ๐Ÿ”’๐Ÿšซ.
    • The martial law prohibited any gatherings of more than four people ๐Ÿšถโ€โ™‚๏ธ๐Ÿšถโ€โ™€๏ธ.
    • General Dyer, who had been given authority to restore order, surrounded the Bagh with his troops ๐Ÿšท๐Ÿ‘ฎโ€โ™‚๏ธ.
    • Exit points were blocked, trapping the peaceful protestors inside the area ๐Ÿšช๐Ÿ”’.
  • The Massacre:

    • Without warning, General Dyer ordered his troops to open fire ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ’ฅ on the unarmed crowd.
    • The soldiers fired live ammunition for over ten minutes โฑ๏ธ๐Ÿ”ซ.
    • It is believed that hundreds of people were killed, with many more injured ๐Ÿฅ๐Ÿ’”.
    • The massacre caused widespread horror and anger across India and the international community ๐ŸŒ๐Ÿ’”.
    • Dyer later justified his actions by stating that his goal was to โ€œproduce a moral effectโ€ ๐Ÿ˜ก๐Ÿ’ฅ.
    • He claimed the goal was to instill fear and break the spirit of resistance by spreading terror ๐Ÿ˜ฑ.
  • Impact and Aftermath:

    • The news of the massacre spread rapidly, leading to outrage across India ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ“ฃ.
    • In several towns, there were strikes ๐Ÿ›‘ and clashes with the police ๐Ÿ‘ฎโ€โ™‚๏ธ๐Ÿšจ as a response to the brutal action.
    • The British governmentโ€™s response was to continue its brutal repression โš”๏ธ๐Ÿ‘ฎโ€โ™‚๏ธ, with humiliation and torture of protestors ๐Ÿ˜ž๐Ÿ’ฅ.
    • The massacre galvanized the Indian freedom movement ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ, strengthening the resolve to resist colonial rule โœŠ๐Ÿ”ฅ.
    • Mahatma Gandhi, seeing the violence spread, eventually called off the movement ๐Ÿ›‘๐Ÿšซ, recognizing the risks of further escalation.
    • Despite Gandhiโ€™s call for non-violence, the massacre led to increased political radicalization ๐Ÿ’ฅ and deeper resentment toward British rule ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡งโŒ.

ย 

3. National Response to Jallianwalla Bagh ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ๐Ÿ”ฅ

  • Protests and Strikes:

    • The horrific news of the Jallianwalla Bagh massacre spread rapidly across north India, triggering widespread protests and strikes ๐Ÿ“ข๐Ÿ‘ฅ.
    • In many cities, crowds gathered to express their anger and solidarity with the victims of the massacre ๐Ÿ™๏ธ๐Ÿ’”.
    • People clashed with the British police ๐Ÿ‘ฎโ€โ™‚๏ธ, confronting their brutality with peaceful resistance โœŠ๐Ÿšท.
    • Protesters also targeted government buildings, including post offices, banks, and railway stations ๐Ÿข๐Ÿ”ฅ, as symbols of British colonial control.
    • The satyagrahis (non-violent protestors) continued to demand justice for the massacre, and the movement gained massive support across the country ๐ŸŒ๐Ÿค.
  • British Repression:

    • The British government, under the command of General Dyer and other officials, responded with extreme repression ๐Ÿ’ฃ๐Ÿ‘ฎโ€โ™‚๏ธ.
    • They sought to humiliate and terrorize the population in an effort to break their resolve and instill fear ๐Ÿ˜ฑ๐Ÿ’ฅ.
    • Satyagrahis were subjected to degrading punishments, such as being forced to rub their noses on the ground ๐Ÿง‘โ€๐Ÿคโ€๐Ÿง‘ and crawl on the streets ๐Ÿ›ฃ๏ธ as a symbol of submission.
    • Protesters were also forced to perform salaams (salutes) to the British officers ๐Ÿ‘‹๐Ÿ™‡โ€โ™‚๏ธ as an act of humiliation and compliance.
    • In Gujranwala, a region in Punjab (now in Pakistan), villages were bombed ๐Ÿ’ฅ๐Ÿš๏ธ by the British forces to instill fear and suppress resistance.
    • The brutal tactics used by the British administration only strengthened the resolve of many Indians to continue fighting for their rights โœŠโš”๏ธ.
  • Gandhiโ€™s Decision to Call Off the Movement:

    • Amid the growing violence and repression ๐Ÿšจ, Mahatma Gandhi faced a critical decision.
    • He realized that the movement had escalated beyond peaceful protest and was leading to unintended violence ๐Ÿ•Š๏ธ๐Ÿ’ฅ.
    • Gandhi decided to call off the movement ๐Ÿ”ดโŒ, recognizing that non-violence was the core principle of his strategy, and further violence would undermine the very goals of the satyagraha.
    • This decision was difficult for Gandhi, as he had hoped to maintain peace and unity across the nation despite the oppression.
    • However, the widespread suffering and violence convinced Gandhi that it was time to reassess the course of action in favor of non-violence and dialogue ๐Ÿ•Š๏ธ๐Ÿ’ฌ.

4. Launch of the Khilafat Movement and Non-Cooperation Movement (1920) ๐Ÿ•Œ๐Ÿค

  • The Khilafat Issue:

    • World War I had ended with the defeat of Ottoman Turkey, and there were rumors that a harsh peace treaty would strip the Ottoman Emperor (the Khalifa) of his religious and political powers ๐ŸŒ๐Ÿ’”.
    • This was a significant issue for Muslims in India, as the Khalifa was considered the spiritual leader of Muslims worldwide ๐ŸŒ๐Ÿ•Œ.
    • In response, a Khilafat Committee was formed in March 1919 in Bombay to defend the Khalifaโ€™s temporal powers ๐Ÿ•Œ๐Ÿ”’.
    • The committee, which had prominent Muslim leaders like the Ali brothers (Muhammad Ali and Shaukat Ali) ๐Ÿง‘โ€๐Ÿคโ€๐Ÿง‘๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ, aimed to preserve the Khalifaโ€™s authority against British intervention.
    • Gandhi saw this as a crucial opportunity to unite Hindus and Muslims under a common cause ๐Ÿค, strengthening the national movement against British rule.
  • Unity of Hindus and Muslims:

    • Mahatma Gandhi believed that the Khilafat issue could be a powerful way to bring Hindus and Muslims together ๐Ÿ‘ซ๐Ÿ•Š๏ธ in the fight against British colonialism.
    • Gandhi recognized the need for a unified national movement that could include both communities, transcending religious divisions ๐Ÿค๐Ÿ•Š๏ธ.
    • He worked closely with young Muslim leaders like Muhammad Ali and Shaukat Ali, who were also committed to the Khilafat cause ๐Ÿง‘โ€๐Ÿคโ€๐Ÿง‘๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ.
    • Gandhi used the Khilafat issue to build a stronger national unity, pushing for a collective effort toward self-rule (swaraj) โœŠ๐Ÿ  for all Indians, regardless of religion.
  • The Non-Cooperation Movement:

    • At the Calcutta Congress session in September 1920, Gandhi presented his vision for a non-cooperation movement against British rule โœŠ๐Ÿšซ.
    • He convinced other Congress leaders to support the idea of a mass boycott of British institutions, including schools, courts, and legislative bodies ๐ŸŽ“โš–๏ธ๐Ÿ›๏ธ.
    • Gandhi linked the non-cooperation movement to both the Khilafat issue and the demand for swaraj (self-rule) ๐ŸŒ๐Ÿ—ณ๏ธ.
    • The movement urged Indians to boycott British goods, stop working for the British government, and embrace indigenous products to weaken British economic control ๐Ÿญ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ.
    • The Non-Cooperation Movement began as a peaceful mass movement with the aim of isolating the British from the Indian population ๐Ÿ™๏ธ๐Ÿ•Š๏ธ.
    • Gandhi believed that through peaceful resistance, Indians could gain political freedom and economic independence ๐Ÿ’กโœŠ.